The next hypotheses finished the theoretical model:

Technique

1806 self-report questionnaires had been administered in 101 classrooms from additional and high schools in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, in November 2007. Approval to conduct the study ended up being acquired through the school that is local and through the principals of each and every college within the test. Parents had been informed through the trained instructors therefore the pupils’ permission has also been required for playing the study. Even though questionnaire aimed to encompass many different tasks and habits, both on the web and offline, a componenticular part ended up being focused on problems linked to online-offline relationship.

On typical, boys within our sample make an online search for 3 hours for a college time (Std. Deviation =1.856) and 5.44 hours on a day weekend

(Std. Deviation=3.311), while girls utilze the internet for 2.77 hours for a college and 4.61 on a weekend day day. Also, the teens have already been making use of the online world for 2.88 years on average (Std. Deviation=2.123). Nearly 1 / 2 of them make use of cam if they talk on IM, guys being less selective than girls (girls utilize the cam having a few buddies, men with practically anyone within their list – the real difference is significant, r=. 143, p Teenagers’ Actions and Interactions Online in Central and Eastern Europe. Potentials and Empowerment, dangers and victimization. Cluj: Cluj University Press.

Com?a, M., Sandu, D., Toth, A., Voicu, M., & Voicu, O. (2006). Public Advice Barometer. Perceptions about Mass-Media. Bucharest: Open Community Foundation.

Couch, D., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Internet dating and dating: making use of the world-wide-web to meet up partners that are sexual. Qualitative Heath Research, 18, 268-280.

Daneback, K. (2006). Sexuality and love on the net. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Goteborg, Goteborg University.

Davis, C. M., & Bauserman, R. (1993). Contact with sexually explicit materials: an mindset modification viewpoint. Yearly post on Intercourse analysis, 4, 121-209.

Davis, C. M., Hart, G., Bolding, G., Sherr, L., & Elford, J. (2006). E-Dating, HIV and identity prevention: Theorising sexualities, danger and community culture. Sociology of wellness & infection, 28, 457-478.

Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes within the on line environment that is dating. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2). Retrieved Mai 2, 2009, from http: //jcmc. Indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison. Html

Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K.J., & Wolak, J. (2000). On the web victimization: a study in the nation’s youth. Alexandria, VA: Nationwide Center for Missing & Exploited Children.

Fleming, M.J., Greentree, S., Cocotti-Muller, D., Elias, K.A., & Morrison, S. (2006). Security on the net: Adolescents’ exposure and safety on the web. Youth & Community, 38, 135-154.

Gibbs, J.L., Ellison, N.B., & Heino, R.D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and identified success in internet relationship. Correspondence Analysis, 33, 152-177.

Goodstein, A. (2007). Totally Wired: What Teens and Tweens Are Actually Doing Online. Ny: Saint Martin’s Griffin.

Groof, S. De (2008). And my mama said…The (general) parental impact on concern about criminal activity among adolescent kids. Youth & Community, 39, 267-293.

Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Web use and wellbeing in adolescence. Journal of Social problems, 58, 75-90.

Harter, S. (1985). Competence as a measurement of self-evaluation: Toward a model that is comprehensive of. In R.E. Leahy (Ed. ), the growth regarding the personal (pp. 55-121). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Heim, J., Brandtz?g, P.B., Kaare, B.H., Endestad, T., & Torgersen, L. (2007). Children’s use of news technologies and factors that are psychosocial. Brand Brand New Media & Community, 9, 425-454.

Hodkinson, P., & Lincoln, S. (2008). On line journals as digital rooms?: young adults, identity and space that is personal. Young, 16, 27-46.

Web World Stats (2009). Online use in European Union Table of internet surfers in eu, March 31, 2009. Retrieved might 26, 2009, from http: //www. Internetworldstats.com/stats9. Htm

Knox, D., Daniels, V., Sturdivant, L., & Zusman, M. (2001). University student utilization of the online for mate selection. University Student Journal, 35, 158-160.

Korbin, J. E (2003). Kiddies, childhoods, and physical physical physical violence. Yearly Reviews of Anthropology, 32, 431-446.

Kraut, R. E., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web paradox: A social technology that decreases social involvement and well-being that is psychological? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1032.

Ledbetter, A. M. (2008). Media usage and relational closeness in long-lasting friendships: Interpreting habits of multimodality. Brand New Media & Community, 10, 547-565.

Lenhart, A. (2005). Protecting Teens On The Web. Washington, DC: The Pew Web & United States Lifetime Venture.

Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teenagers, Privacy and Online social networking sites: exactly just How Teens manage their on line Identities and information that is personal within the chronilogical age of MySpace. Washington, DC: The Pew Online & United States Lifetime Project.

Livingstone, S. (2002). Young adults and Brand Brand New Media. London: Sage Publications.

Livingstone, S. (2003). Children’s utilization of the Web: Reflections for the growing research agenda. Brand Brand New Media & Society, 9, 147-166.

Livingstone, S. (2008). Using opportunities that are risky youthful article marketing: teens’ usage of social network web sites for closeness, privacy and self-expression. https://besthookupwebsites.net/grizzly-review/ Brand New Media & Society, 10, 393-411.

Mesch, G.S. (2009). Personal bonds and Web pornographic publicity among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 601-18.

Meyer, A. (2007). The ethical rhetoric of youth. Childhood 14(1), 85-104.

Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2001). Danger factors for and impact of online intimate solicitations of youth (brief report). Journal regarding the United states healthcare Association 285, 3011-3014. Doi: 10.1001/jama. 285.23.3011.

Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2003a). Victimization of youth on the net. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 8 (1/2), 1-39.

Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2003b). The visibility of youth to undesired intimate product on the world-wide-web. A nationwide study of danger, effect, and avoidance. Youth & Community, 34, 330-358.

Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2004). Victimization of youngsters on the web. In J.L. Mullings, J.W. Marquart & D.J. Hartley (Eds.). The Victimization of Kids: Emerging Issues (pp. 1-39). Nyc, NY: The Haworth Maltreatment & Trauma Press.

Moscardelli, D.M., & Divine, R. (2007). Adolescents’ issues for privacy while using the Web: an analysis that is empirical of and relationships with privacy- protective actions. Family and customer Science analysis Journal, 35(3), 232-253.

Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2006a). Adolescents’ exposure to intimately explicit product on the net. Correspondence Analysis, 33, 178-204.

Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2006b). Analysis note: specific distinctions in perceptions of online interaction. European Journal of correspondence, 21, 213-226.

Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2007). Whom actively seeks casual times on the net? A test for the settlement as well as the relaxation hypotheses. Brand Brand Brand New Media & Community, 9, 455-474.

Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2008). Adolescents exposure that is sexually explicit online product, intimate doubt, and attitudes toward uncommitted sexual exploration: will there be a hyperlink? Correspondence Analysis, 35, 579-601.

Rosen, L.D. (2006). Adolescents in MySpace: identification formation, relationship and predators that are sexual. (Executive summary). Retrieved 17, 2008, from http: //www. Csudh.edu/psych/ december.

Smith, A. (2007). Teenagers and Online Stranger Contact. (information memo). Washington, DC: The Pew Web & United States Lifestyle Project.

Toma, C.L., Hancock, J.T., & Ellison, N.B. (2008). Breaking up reality from fiction: an assessment of misleading self-presentation in on the web profiles that are dating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036.

Tynes, B.M. (2007). Online security gone crazy?: compromising the educational and mental great things about online environments that are social. Journal of Adolescent analysis, 22, 575- 585.

Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the net. Effects for social competence and self-concept unity. Communication Analysis, 35, 208-231.

Walsh, W.A., & Wolak, J. (2005). Nonforcible Internet-related sex crimes with adolescent victims: Prosecution dilemmas and results. Child Maltreatment, 10(3), 260-271.

Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered down, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated interaction and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds. ), Handbook of Interpersonal Correspondence (3rd Ed.). (pp. 529-563). London: Sage Publications.

Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2002). Close on line relationships in a nationwide test of adolescents. Adolescence, 37, 441-455.

Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Undesired and desired visibility to online pornography in a sample that is national of online users. Pediatrics, 119, 247-257.

(1) The pattern may not connect with SNS pages, where teens have a tendency to add ”friends” merely to improve their online status.

Publicidad